<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" ?>

<rss version="2.0" 
   xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#"
   xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/"
   xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
   xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
   xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
   xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
   >
<channel>
    <title>Topbit Technicals - Comments</title>
    <link>http://www.topbit.co.uk/serendipity/</link>
    <description>Topbit Technicals - @todo 'write technical blog'</description>
    <dc:language>en</dc:language>
    <admin:errorReportsTo rdf:resource="mailto:topbit+s9yblog@gmail.com" />
    <generator>Serendipity 1.3-beta1 - http://www.s9y.org/</generator>
    <managingEditor>topbit+editor@gmail.com</managingEditor>
<webMaster>topbit+webmaster@gmail.com</webMaster>
<ttl>3600</ttl>
<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 14:17:30 GMT</pubDate>

    

<item>
    <title>Mark Sailes: svn checkouts vs exports for live versions</title>
    <link>http://www.topbit.co.uk/serendipity/archives/1-svn-checkouts-vs-exports-for-live-versions.html#c1</link>
            <category></category>
    
    <comments>http://www.topbit.co.uk/serendipity/archives/1-svn-checkouts-vs-exports-for-live-versions.html#comments</comments>
    <wfw:comment>http://www.topbit.co.uk/serendipity/wfwcomment.php?cid=1</wfw:comment>

    

    <author>nospam@example.com (Mark Sailes)</author>
    <content:encoded>
    	&lt;p&gt;Although example shown was using Windows (my desktop) there is no reason why this can&amp;#8217;t be used on Linux or as we do &lt;span class=&quot;caps&quot;&gt;HP-UX&lt;/span&gt;.&lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

We are lucky enough to be able to turn off web server in groups via the load balancer  when we do updates. But of course using ln -s is another great method too. &lt;br /&gt;

&lt;br /&gt;

Our main website is over 300mb with over 6000 files, and with a large cluster of machines its just not cool to use an export. Although a combination of the two ideas would not be a terrible idea either. Why not have two working copies, do a switch on the offline to update it. Then swap the link across. I might try it :D&lt;/p&gt; 
    </content:encoded>

    <pubDate>Sun, 16 Mar 2008 21:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
    <guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.topbit.co.uk/serendipity/archives/1-guid.html#c1</guid>
    
</item>

</channel>
</rss>